Sometimes a two-year-old wins impressively and the temptation is to get carried away. Big margins make good headlines, but they don't necessarily make exceptional horses.
Musical Times' victory in the May Hill Stakes at Doncaster deserves a closer look because, this time, several independent pieces of evidence point in the same direction.
Charlie Appleby's filly didn't simply win the Group 2. She travelled through the race like the best horse, accelerated when William Buick asked her and put 7½ lengths between herself and Scommessa Sicura.
The visual impression screamed quality.
But let's put the replay to one side and investigate the numbers.
The headline time doesn't tell the whole story
Musical Times covered Doncaster's mile in 1:37.58 on ground officially described as good to soft.
The Racing Post reports that as 0.98 seconds slower than standard.
Taken literally, that doesn't sound extraordinary.
But standard times are only useful when placed in context. Look at the Racing Post comparisons for the eight races on the Doncaster card:
+0.34, +0.26, +0.31, +0.00, +0.12, +0.36, +0.49 and +0.12 seconds per furlong.
The median was approximately +0.29 sec/f.
Musical Times was only +0.12 sec/f.
So although she was nominally slower than Racing Post standard, she was considerably faster relative to standard than the typical performance on the card.
That's our first clue.
HRB gives us another perspective
I then ran the race through HorseRaceBase's Standard Time Calculator.
For Doncaster over the exact mile, using the historical data and our selected weighting of overall, class, going and class/going medians, HRB produces a Class 1, good-to-soft standard of 100.51 seconds.
Musical Times ran 97.58.
That's:
2.93 seconds faster than the HRB contextual standard.
There's an interesting historical comparison too.
Last year's May Hill, also Class 1 over the same mile on officially good-to-soft ground, was run in 99.79 seconds.
Musical Times ran 97.58.
That's 2.21 seconds quicker.
Different days can never be compared literally without accounting for conditions, but it gives some perspective to what she achieved.
Then come the sectionals
This is where the performance becomes particularly interesting.
A fast overall time can sometimes be misleading. A horse can be dragged through an overly aggressive gallop, record a big time figure and stagger home.
Conversely, spectacular closing sectionals can be produced after a crawl.
We want overall speed combined with efficient energy distribution.
Musical Times gave us both.
The race's closing two furlongs were:
24.0 seconds — 101.6% finishing speed.
Musical Times individually recorded:
23.9 seconds — 102.1%.
Our earlier furlong-by-furlong analysis was even more revealing.
Her final furlong was approximately 12.23 seconds.
Scommessa Sicura: 13.05
Speckles: 13.05
That's roughly 0.82 seconds between Musical Times and the second and third over the final furlong alone.
The important part isn't simply that she finished faster.
Her sectional profile remained remarkably close to the historical efficiency par throughout the race. She wasn't crawling early and sprinting late; nor was she being emptied by an unsustainable gallop.
She was travelling efficiently and still had acceleration available when the race was decided.
That's the hallmark I find particularly interesting.
What about the horses behind?
We shouldn't pretend every piece of form is bombproof.
Sea Of Rain scoped dirty afterwards. Beguiled hung badly left. Ballyskeagh ran well below expectations.
And Racing Post described the race as perhaps not the deepest May Hill of recent years.
Those are legitimate negatives.
But Scommessa Sicura is the important reference point.
She entered with an official rating of 97, raced prominently, finished second and Racing Post's assessment was that she essentially ran her race — she simply had no answer to the winner.
Musical Times arrived rated 93.
She beat that 97-rated benchmark by 7½ lengths.
Whatever precise figure eventually gets attached to the performance, 93 plainly no longer describes her ability.
The most revealing comment came afterwards
Charlie Appleby highlighted something that the numbers had already told us.
He talked about Musical Times possessing significant natural pace, travelling up to the leaders and, crucially, accelerating.
That's interesting because trainer opinion and objective evidence have arrived independently at essentially the same conclusion.
Appleby has also confirmed the Fillies' Mile as the next target and went as far as saying he sees Musical Times as more naturally suited to becoming a 1,000 Guineas filly than his previous May Hill winner Desert Flower was at the corresponding stage.
That's some comparison.
Desert Flower went from the May Hill to the Fillies' Mile, won the 1,000 Guineas the following spring and subsequently finished third in the Oaks.
Nobody should assume Musical Times will reproduce that career.
But the intended path tells us how highly Godolphin regard her.
So, did we see a Group 1 filly?
We can't know yet.
That's racing.
But we can price the evidence.
Visual impression: strong.
Winning margin: strong.
Form benchmark: strong.
Overall time relative to the card: strong.
HRB contextual time: very strong.
Sectional efficiency: strong.
Acceleration: strong.
When several largely independent measures all point in the same direction, our confidence should increase.
My conclusion is therefore stronger than simply saying “Musical Times was impressive.”
There is substantial evidence that the May Hill was the performance of a genuine Group 1-quality two-year-old.
The Fillies' Mile should tell us considerably more.
No comments:
Post a Comment